en
Microsoft Azure Web App - Error 404
IndustryOriginGlobal rankRank in 
Updated at The higher the score, the more externally observable protections the system has recorded. This page does not certify that the website is reputable, legitimate, or completely free of vulnerabilities.
As of August 22, 2026 at 08:30, www.makro.com has a security score of 59/100 (grade F – “Low”). CyStack’s automated assessment recorded 14 issues to review after completing 100% of applicable checks. The website owner should address “Certificate matches the website” first, then review the remaining items in order of impact.
At assessment time, CyStack did not find www.makro.com or related infrastructure on any scam, phishing, or malware warning list after checking 5 online reputation sources. This result reflects external observations; it does not guarantee absolute safety or verify the organization’s legal status or reputation.
These matching email records were observed previously, but they may already have been addressed or may no longer be valid. The device count estimates infected devices associated with these email records; it is not the number of devices owned by the organization.
Frequently asked questions
A valid SSL certificate still does not prove that www.makro.com is safe, legitimate, or free of scam signals. For a more complete assessment, this report also checks phishing and malware, exposed email records, IPs and open ports, subdomains, technologies, and CVEs that may apply to observed versions.
HTTPS on www.makro.com presented a certificate that was invalid or failed verification. The operator should review its validity dates, domain names, and trust chain.
Review HTTPS and certificateData sources
CyStack compiles scan results from its internal cybersecurity monitoring systems, including CyStack VulnScan and CyStack Threat Intelligence, together with publicly available Internet data. The assessment only observes and analyzes information already available; it does not attempt unauthorized access, test passwords, send exploit code, or change or disrupt the assessed system.
CyStack VulnScan continuously discovers assets, validates vulnerabilities, and helps security teams prioritize remediation across the enterprise.
These 3 failed checks or warnings have the greatest impact on the result for www.makro.com.
Why it matters
The certificate must list the exact hostname visitors requested in its Subject Alternative Names (SAN). A mismatch produces browser warnings because the certificate may belong to a different service.
What to do
Issue and deploy a certificate whose SAN list includes every public hostname served by this website address.
Diagnostic information
The available certificate evidence was not sufficient to conclude this certificate requirement.
Evidence and check scope
Why it matters
Content Security Policy (CSP) limits where scripts, styles, frames, and other browser content may come from. A strong policy reduces the impact if an attacker manages to inject content into a page.
What to do
Define only the sources the application needs, test the policy before activating it, and avoid broad wildcard (*) rules, unsafe-inline, and unsafe-eval where possible.
Why it matters
TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 use outdated security designs and are no longer accepted by modern standards. Leaving them enabled allows older, weaker connection methods.
What to do
Disable TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, support TLS 1.2 securely, and enable TLS 1.3 where possible.
Evidence and check scope
Data provided by CyStack Threat Intelligence.
Website rankings and industry category are based on data from Similarweb
This is a quick, point-in-time check from outside the organization. It can surface visible risks, but it does not replace penetration testing or an authenticated assessment.
There are currently 4 exposed email records matching the makro.com domain. These records may be old or already resolved. The website owner should verify them before resetting passwords or locking related accounts.
No technology could be identified with enough confidence on www.makro.com to run version-based CVE matching.
Review technologies and CVEsThe assessment observed 1 public IPs and 2 open ports for www.makro.com. An open port is not the same as a vulnerability, but the website owner should keep every public service updated and appropriately restrict access.
Review IPs and open portsThe assessment observed 11+ public subdomains of makro.com. This list can reveal additional entry points such as APIs, administration systems, or test environments, but it does not mean that every subdomain is risky.
Review discovered subdomainsScope of this check
This check only evaluates the homepage response and content that the scanner could reach. Other pages and sign-in flows may use different settings.
Evidence and check scope
References
References
Recently completed assessments, prioritizing websites with a similar sector, country or security grade for easier comparison.
