CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

What is CWE-404?

CWE-404 is Improper Resource Shutdown or Release. The flaw arises when the product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. The database currently holds 132 vulnerabilities mapped to CWE-404 and none of them are in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

OWASP Top 10 Rank-
Related CVES (365 days)132
AbstractionClass
Likelihood of exploitMedium

Vulnerabilities mapped to CWE-404

132 vulnerabilities149% increase year over year

No data

No vulnerability data in CISA KEV for CWE-404

Official definition

ByMitre CWE

The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.

When a resource is created or allocated, the developer is responsible for properly releasing the resource as well as accounting for all potential paths of expiration or invalidation, such as a set period of time or revocation.

Characteristics

Modes of introduction

  • Implementation

Common consequences

ImpactScopeExplanation
DoS: Resource Consumption (Other), Varies by ContextAvailability, OtherMost unreleased resource issues result in general software reliability problems, but if an attacker can intentionally trigger a resource leak, the attacker might be able to launch a denial of service attack by depleting the resource pool.
Read Application DataConfidentialityWhen a resource containing sensitive information is not correctly shutdown, it may expose the sensitive data in a subsequent allocation.

Risk mitigations

  1. Language Selection · RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, languages such as Java, Ruby, and Lisp perform automatic garbage collection that releases memory for objects that have been deallocated.
  2. ImplementationIt is good practice to be responsible for freeing all resources you allocate and to be consistent with how and where you free memory in a function. If you allocate memory that you intend to free upon completion of the function, you must be sure to free the memory at all exit points for that function including error conditions.
  3. ImplementationMemory should be allocated/freed using matching functions such as malloc/free, new/delete, and new[]/delete[].
  4. ImplementationWhen releasing a complex object or structure, ensure that you properly dispose of all of its member components, not just the object itself.

Detection methods

MethodApproachEffectiveness
Automated Dynamic AnalysisThis weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results. Resource clean up errors might be detected with a stress-test by calling the software simultaneously from a large number of threads or processes, and look for evidence of any unexpected behavior. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.Moderate
Manual Dynamic AnalysisIdentify error conditions that are not likely to occur during normal usage and trigger them. For example, run the product under low memory conditions, run with insufficient privileges or permissions, interrupt a transaction before it is completed, or disable connectivity to basic network services such as DNS. Monitor the software for any unexpected behavior. If you trigger an unhandled exception or similar error that was discovered and handled by the application's environment, it may still indicate unexpected conditions that were not handled by the application itself.-
Automated Static AnalysisAutomated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)High

Representative vulnerabilities

Sources (2)

CWE™ Program, operated by The MITRE Corporation. Copyright © 2006–2026, The MITRE Corporation. The MITRE Corporation hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use CWE for research, development, and commercial purposes. CWE Terms of Use.

Learn more

Run an in-depth assessment with complete web risk management

CyStack VulnScan continuously discovers assets, validates vulnerabilities, and helps security teams prioritize remediation across the organization.