CWE-1286: Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input

What is CWE-1286?

CWE-1286 is Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input. The flaw arises when the product receives input that is expected to be well-formed - i.e., to comply with a certain syntax - but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax. The database currently holds 30 vulnerabilities mapped to CWE-1286 and none of them are in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Analyzing data...

OWASP Top 10 Rank-
Related CVES (365 days)30
AbstractionBase
Likelihood of exploit-

Vulnerabilities mapped to CWE-1286

30 vulnerabilities200% increase year over year

No data

No vulnerability data in CISA KEV for CWE-1286

Official definition

ByMitre CWE

The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed - i.e., to comply with a certain syntax - but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax.

Often, complex inputs are expected to follow a particular syntax, which is either assumed by the input itself, or declared within metadata such as headers. The syntax could be for data exchange formats, markup languages, or even programming languages. When untrusted input is not properly validated for the expected syntax, attackers could cause parsing failures, trigger unexpected errors, or expose latent vulnerabilities that might not be directly exploitable if the input had conformed to the syntax.

Characteristics

Modes of introduction

  • Implementation

Common consequences

ImpactScopeExplanation
Varies by ContextOther-

Risk mitigations

  1. Input Validation · Implementation · Effectiveness: HighAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

Representative vulnerabilities

Below are representative vulnerabilities related to this CWE, prioritized by severity.

Sources (2)
MITRE CWE
CWE Terms of Use

CWE™ Program, operated by The MITRE Corporation. Copyright © 2006–2026, The MITRE Corporation. The MITRE Corporation hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use CWE for research, development, and commercial purposes. CWE Terms of Use.

Learn more

Run an in-depth assessment with complete web risk management

CyStack VulnScan continuously discovers assets, validates vulnerabilities, and helps security teams prioritize remediation across the organization.

Explore CyStack VulnScan
More resources & insights

Explore more resources from CyStack

Website security reports

Review CyStack's security rating and practical recommendations for websites and edge assets.

Learn more

CyStack research

Explore cybersecurity research from our team of security specialists.

Learn more

Cybersecurity knowledge

Browse practical cybersecurity knowledge across CyStack's articles and guides.

Learn more