Insufficient firmware authenticity verification in Schneider Electric SAGE RTU products can enable device control

Note: This data is for reference and cybersecurity research purposes only.CyStack advises users not to use this information for unlawful purposes.

What is CVE-2026-102250?

CVE-2026-102250 is a vulnerability classified as Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity, affecting Sage RTU 1410 (affected versions: All versions prior to version C3414-500-S02L0), Sage RTU 1430 (affected versions: All versions prior to version C3414-500-S02L0), Sage RTU 1450 (affected versions: All versions prior to version C3414-500-S02L0), and 3 more products. This vulnerability is rated High, with a CVSS score of 8.6. Current sources do not report this vulnerability as exploited.

Overview

Original source data

CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability exists that could allow modified firmware to be uploaded when an authorized admin user begins a firmware update procedure which could result in control over the device.

Affected products and scope

Schneider Electric identifies the following products as affected:

  • Sage RTU 1410: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.
  • Sage RTU 1430: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.
  • Sage RTU 1450: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.
  • Sage RTU 2400: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.
  • Sage RTU 3030 Magnum: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.
  • Sage RTU 4400: all versions prior to C3414-500-S02L0.

The vendor advisory identifies C3414-500-S02L0 as containing the fix for all six products. No other release-branch boundaries are provided in the reviewed evidence, so the status of parallel or other releases should not be inferred beyond this exact statement.

Technical details

This is a CWE-345 weakness in which firmware authenticity is not sufficiently verified before the firmware is accepted. During the firmware update procedure, a modified firmware image may be uploaded when an authorized administrator initiates the process. The recorded attack characteristics describe network reachability, low complexity, high privileges, and no additional user interaction after the required administrative access is available. The weakness applies to the six SAGE RTU models listed in the advisory, but the advisory does not identify the precise signature, hash, certificate, or firmware validation mechanism that is missing or bypassed. It also does not document a specific endpoint, protocol, file format, or payload.

Exploitability

  • The weakness is reachable over the network and requires high administrative privileges on the device or update interface.
  • The record describes low attack complexity and no additional user interaction after an authorized administrator begins the firmware update procedure.
  • The supplied record does not establish a local attack path or a path requiring lower privileges.
  • The current record does not identify a public exploit, and the reviewed advisory data records exploitation as none. This is a current reporting status, not proof that the weakness has never been abused.

Technical impact

An actor who can satisfy the required administrative privilege and reach the update function may cause the RTU to accept modified firmware. The immediate technical outcome is altered firmware and potentially altered device behavior, with the advisory describing possible control over the device. For substation data acquisition and control equipment, this could disrupt or falsify operational functions, but the record does not specify a particular process consequence, safety impact, or compromise of connected systems. Exploitation remains dependent on authorized administrative access and the firmware update workflow.

Business impact

  • Device integrity: Malicious firmware could change RTU behavior after it is accepted during the upgrade procedure.
  • Operational risk: SAGE RTU devices support substation data acquisition and control, so changed behavior could affect the integrity or availability of operational functions. This is a possible consequence, not a documented incident.
  • Control risk: Successful exploitation may provide control over the affected device, but the record does not establish access to connected systems or a broader compromise.
  • Maintenance impact: The vendor fix requires a reboot, so operators should plan and test the update before deployment.

Remediation

  1. Upgrade each affected model to the vendor-specified fixed release C3414-500-S02L0. This is the exact release confirmed by the vendor, not an assumption that every later or parallel release branch is covered.
  2. Plan for the required reboot. Back up the device and evaluate the update in a Test and Development environment or on offline infrastructure before applying it to production systems.
  3. After the upgrade, open the CPU configuration page and verify that the displayed firmware version is correct.
  4. Until the upgrade is complete, reduce exposure by placing control networks and remote devices behind firewalls, isolating them from business networks, and ensuring that RTUs are not directly accessible from the Internet.
  5. When remote access is required, use secure methods such as an appropriately maintained VPN. Maintain physical controls, keep controllers in locked cabinets, do not leave controllers in Program mode, connect programming software only to the intended network, and scan data exchange media before use in the isolated network.

Detection

  1. Inventory Schneider Electric SAGE RTU 1410, SAGE RTU 1430, SAGE RTU 1450, SAGE RTU 2400, SAGE RTU 3030 Magnum, and SAGE RTU 4400 deployments, and record the exact installed firmware version.
  2. Flag devices running versions within the affected boundary described in affected_summary.
  3. For devices that have been upgraded, open the CPU configuration page and verify that the displayed firmware version matches the deployed version.
  4. Review firmware update activity and administrator account use around upgrades, and investigate unexpected changes in device behavior. This is a precautionary review because the advisory does not define specific log events or IOCs.
  5. Check RTU network reachability, especially Internet exposure, connections from business networks, and remote access paths. The absence of log evidence does not prove that a device is safe.
Sources (11)
Learn more

Run an in-depth assessment with complete web risk management

CyStack VulnScan continuously discovers assets, validates vulnerabilities, and helps security teams prioritize remediation across the organization.