Opening the security report for www.psl.design.upenn.edu
www.psl.design.upenn.edu
Loading the security report for www.psl.design.upenn.edu
www.psl.design.upenn.edu
Is www.psl.design.upenn.edu Safe? Security Score 79/100 | CyStack
www.psl.design.upenn.edu
psl | Polyhedral Structures Laboratory
PSL is an interdisciplinary research lab connecting architecture, structural engineering, computer science, mathematics and material science to enrich architectural geometry and to reconcile function, form, and technology.
Industry
Science and Education / Universities and Colleges
Origin
United States
Global rank
#5,053
Rank in United States
#1,264
Updated at
C79/100
Security level
Fair
Data confidence
High
Scope checked
94.5%
The higher the score, the more externally observable protections the system has recorded. This page does not certify that the website is reputable, legitimate, or completely free of vulnerabilities.
Is the website “www.psl.design.upenn.edu” safe?
As of September 21, 2026 at 13:07, www.psl.design.upenn.edu has a security score of 79/100 (grade C: “Fair”). CyStack’s automated assessment recorded 13 issues to review after completing 94.5% of applicable checks. The website owner should address “Allowed browser content (CSP)” first, then review the remaining items in order of impact.
Does www.psl.design.upenn.edu show known scam, phishing, or malware signals?
At assessment time, CyStack did not find www.psl.design.upenn.edu or related infrastructure on any scam, phishing, or malware warning list after checking 5 online reputation sources. This result reflects external observations; it does not guarantee absolute safety or verify the organization’s legal status or reputation.
What affects the security of www.psl.design.upenn.edu?
A valid SSL certificate still does not prove that www.psl.design.upenn.edu is safe, legitimate, or free of scam signals. For a more complete assessment, this report also checks phishing and malware, exposed email records, IPs and open ports, subdomains, technologies, and CVEs that may apply to observed versions.
Does www.psl.design.upenn.edu use HTTPS, and is its SSL certificate valid?
www.psl.design.upenn.edu used a valid SSL certificate at assessment time, valid until November 30, 2026. This status may change when the certificate expires or the server configuration changes.
Data compiled from CyStack cybersecurity monitoring systems
CyStack compiles scan results from its internal cybersecurity monitoring systems, including CyStack VulnScan and CyStack Threat Intelligence, together with publicly available Internet data. The assessment only observes and analyzes information already available; it does not attempt unauthorized access, test passwords, send exploit code, or change or disrupt the assessed system.
These 3 failed checks or warnings have the greatest impact on the result for www.psl.design.upenn.edu.
Allowed browser content (CSP)The inspected root HTML response does not include a Content-Security-Policy header.High
Why it matters
Content Security Policy (CSP) limits where scripts, styles, frames, and other browser content may come from. A strong policy reduces the impact if an attacker manages to inject content into a page.
What to do
Define only the sources the application needs, test the policy before activating it, and avoid broad wildcard (*) rules, unsafe-inline, and unsafe-eval where possible.
Scope of this check
This check only evaluates the homepage response and content that the scanner could reach. Other pages and sign-in flows may use different settings.
Potential CVEs for observed versionsFound 8 potentially applicable CVE candidate(s), including 1 high or critical candidate(s).High
Why it matters
This check compares an observed product only when a reliable version and exact CPE identity are available, using applicability records from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Any returned match is a lead, not confirmation: the installed software may include vendor fixes or differ from the version visible on the Internet.
What to do
DMARC blocking policyThe effective DMARC policy is none and applies to 100% of messages.High
Why it matters
A policy of quarantine or reject tells receiving services to move suspicious mail to spam or refuse it. A monitoring-only policy (p=none) records the problem but does not ask receivers to stop spoofed mail.
What to do
After every legitimate sender passes DMARC, move gradually to quarantine and then reject, covering 100% of messages.
–
Operating system
Public infrastructure and exposed software
Each public IP is grouped with its open services, identified products and any CVEs that may apply to the observed version.
Completed testing of 58 TCP ports
23.185.0.2
2 open services17 identified products
Hosting or network providerProvider not identified
Network location–
ASN–
80HTTPnginx
ProductVersionPotential vulnerabilities
nginxVersion not visible
2620:12a:8000::2
0 open services
Hosting or network providerProvider not identified
Network location–
ASN–
No open service was observed on this address in the ports checked.
2620:12a:8001::2
0 open services
Hosting or network providerProvider not identified
Network location–
ASN–
No open service was observed on this address in the ports checked.
Have @upenn.edu email addresses appeared in exposed data or information-stealer (infostealer) logs?
There are currently 63 exposed email records matching the upenn.edu domain. These records may be old or already resolved. The website owner should verify them before resetting passwords or locking related accounts.
Which public IPs, services, and ports does www.psl.design.upenn.edu expose?
The assessment observed 3 public IPs and 2 open ports for www.psl.design.upenn.edu. An open port is not the same as a vulnerability, but the website owner should keep every public service updated and appropriately restrict access.
How many subdomains of upenn.edu have been discovered?
The assessment observed 739+ public subdomains of upenn.edu. This list can reveal additional entry points such as APIs, administration systems, or test environments, but it does not mean that every subdomain is risky.
Confirm the exact installed package and read the vendor advisory. If that installation is affected, apply the vendor patch or upgrade to a fixed version.
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress is an open publishing platform for the Web. It's possible for a file of a type other than a zip file to be submitted as a new plugin by an administrative user on the Plugins -> Add New -> Upload Plugin screen in WordPress. If FTP credentials are requested for installation (in order to move the file into place outside of the `uploads` directory) then the uploaded file remains temporary available in the Media Library despite it not being allowed. If the `DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT` constant is set to `true` on the site _and_ FTP credentials are required when uploading a new theme or plugin, then this technically allows an RCE when the user would otherwise have no means of executing arbitrary PHP code. This issue _only_ affects Administrator level users on single site installations, and Super Admin level users on Multisite installations where it's otherwise expected that the user does not have permission to upload or execute arbitrary PHP code. Lower level users are not affected. Sites where the `DISALLOW_FILE_MODS` constant is set to `true` are not affected. Sites where an administrative user either does not need to enter FTP credentials or they have access to the valid FTP credentials, are not affected. The issue was fixed in WordPress 6.4.3 on January 30, 2024 and backported to versions 6.3.3, 6.2.4, 6.1.5, 6.0.7, 5.9.9, 5.8.9, 5.7.11, 5.6.13, 5.5.14, 5.4.15, 5.3.17, 5.2.20, 5.1.18, 5.0.21, 4.9.25, 2.8.24, 4.7.28, 4.6.28, 4.5.31, 4.4.32, 4.3.33, 4.2.37, and 4.1.40. A workaround is available. If the `DISALLOW_FILE_MODS` constant is defined as `true` then it will not be possible for any user to upload a plugin and therefore this issue will not be exploitable.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress Core is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in versions up to, and including, 6.2, via the ‘wp_lang’ parameter. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access and load arbitrary translation files. In cases where an attacker is able to upload a crafted translation file onto the site, such as via an upload form, this could be also used to perform a Cross-Site Scripting attack.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress Core is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via user display names in the Avatar block in various versions up to 6.5.2 due to insufficient output escaping on the display name. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. In addition, it also makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that have the comment block present and display the comment author's avatar.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress is affected by an unauthenticated blind SSRF in the pingback feature. Because of a TOCTOU race condition between the validation checks and the HTTP request, attackers can reach internal hosts that are explicitly forbidden.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
Auth. Stored (contributor+) Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WordPress core 6.3 through 6.3.1, from 6.2 through 6.2.2, from 6.1 through 6.1.3, from 6.0 through 6.0.5, from 5.9 through 5.9.7 and Gutenberg plugin <= 16.8.0 versions.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress through 6.1.1 depends on unpredictable client visits to cause wp-cron.php execution and the resulting security updates, and the source code describes "the scenario where a site may not receive enough visits to execute scheduled tasks in a timely manner," but neither the installation guide nor the security guide mentions this default behavior, or alerts the user about security risks on installations with very few visits.
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
WordPress does not properly restrict which user fields are searchable via the REST API, allowing unauthenticated attackers to discern the email addresses of users who have published public posts on an affected website via an Oracle style attack
Matched product: WordPress 6.1.1 Confidence: Medium
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in WordPress from 6.3 through 6.3.1, from 6.2 through 6.2.2, from 6.1 through 6.13, from 6.0 through 6.0.5, from 5.9 through 5.9.7, from 5.8 through 5.8.7, from 5.7 through 5.7.9, from 5.6 through 5.6.11, from 5.5 through 5.5.12, from 5.4 through 5.4.13, from 5.3 through 5.3.15, from 5.2 through 5.2.18, from 5.1 through 5.1.16, from 5.0 through 5.0.19, from 4.9 through 4.9.23, from 4.8 through 4.8.22, from 4.7 through 4.7.26, from 4.6 through 4.6.26, from 4.5 through 4.5.29, from 4.4 through 4.4.30, from 4.3 through 4.3.31, from 4.2 through 4.2.35, from 4.1 through 4.1.38.
Divi is a WordPress Theme and standalone WordPress plugin from Elegant themes that allows users to build websites using the visual drag-and-drop Divi page builder.
Fastly is a cloud computing services provider. Fastly's cloud platform provides a content delivery network, Internet security services, load balancing, and video & streaming services.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.
jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices.