en
UNESCO in the UK | Building lasting peace through education, the sciences, culture, communication & information.
An independent body, the National Commission is a constitutional part of the UK's membership of UNESCO. We are the central hub for all UNESCO-related matters in the UK.
IndustryOriginGlobal rankRank in United Kingdom
Updated at The higher the score, the more externally observable protections the system has recorded. This page does not certify that the website is reputable, legitimate, or completely free of vulnerabilities.
As of September 9, 2026 at 16:27, unesco.org.uk has a security score of 96/100 (grade A+ – “Exceptional”). CyStack’s automated assessment recorded 4 issues to review after completing 97.3% of applicable checks. The website owner should address “Allowed browser content (CSP)” first, then review the remaining items in order of impact.
At assessment time, CyStack did not find unesco.org.uk or related infrastructure on any scam, phishing, or malware warning list after checking 5 online reputation sources. This result reflects external observations; it does not guarantee absolute safety or verify the organization’s legal status or reputation.
No exposure record was found for an email address whose domain exactly matches this target. This does not guarantee that an exposure has never occurred.
Frequently asked questions
A valid SSL certificate still does not prove that unesco.org.uk is safe, legitimate, or free of scam signals. For a more complete assessment, this report also checks phishing and malware, exposed email records, IPs and open ports, subdomains, technologies, and CVEs that may apply to observed versions.
unesco.org.uk used a valid SSL certificate at assessment time, valid until November 24, 2026. This status may change when the certificate expires or the server configuration changes.
Review HTTPS and certificateData sources
CyStack compiles scan results from its internal cybersecurity monitoring systems, including CyStack VulnScan and CyStack Threat Intelligence, together with publicly available Internet data. The assessment only observes and analyzes information already available; it does not attempt unauthorized access, test passwords, send exploit code, or change or disrupt the assessed system.
CyStack VulnScan continuously discovers assets, validates vulnerabilities, and helps security teams prioritize remediation across the enterprise.
These 3 failed checks or warnings have the greatest impact on the result for unesco.org.uk.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy (CSP) limits where scripts, styles, frames, and other browser content may come from. A strong policy reduces the impact if an attacker manages to inject content into a page.
What to do
Define only the sources the application needs, test the policy before activating it, and avoid broad wildcard (*) rules, unsafe-inline, and unsafe-eval where possible.
Scope of this check
This check only evaluates the homepage response and content that the scanner could reach. Other pages and sign-in flows may use different settings.
Evidence and check scope
References
Why it matters
A policy of quarantine or reject tells receiving services to move suspicious mail to spam or refuse it. A monitoring-only policy (p=none) records the problem but does not ask receivers to stop spoofed mail.
What to do
After every legitimate sender passes DMARC, move gradually to quarantine and then reject, covering 100% of messages.
Evidence and check scope
Why it matters
The final SPF rule tells receiving services how confidently they should reject unlisted senders. A permissive result allows more spoofed mail to appear legitimate than a hard fail (-all).
What to do
Confirm that every legitimate sender is included, then end the SPF record with -all.
Evidence and check scope
Website rankings and industry category are based on data from Similarweb
This is a quick, point-in-time check from outside the organization. It can surface visible risks, but it does not replace penetration testing or an authenticated assessment.
No record associated with an @unesco.org.uk email address was found in the currently available data. This does not rule out incidents that have not been observed.
Review exposed email recordsThe assessment identified 37 technologies on unesco.org.uk, but no version was reliable enough for accurate CVE matching.
Review technologies and CVEsThe assessment observed 6 public IPs and 12 open ports for unesco.org.uk. An open port is not the same as a vulnerability, but the website owner should keep every public service updated and appropriately restrict access.
Review IPs and open portsThe assessment observed 10+ public subdomains of unesco.org.uk. This list can reveal additional entry points such as APIs, administration systems, or test environments, but it does not mean that every subdomain is risky.
Review discovered subdomainsReferences
References
Recently completed assessments, prioritizing websites with a similar sector, country or security grade for easier comparison.
United Kingdom
