The higher the score, the more externally observable protections the system has recorded. This page does not certify that the website is reputable, legitimate, or completely free of vulnerabilities.
Is the website “ignica.com” safe?
As of October 23, 2026 at 19:21, ignica.com has a security score of 81.1/100 (grade B: “Good”). CyStack’s automated assessment recorded 13 issues to review after completing 100% of applicable checks. The website owner should address “Known-exploited CVE candidates” first, then review the remaining items in order of impact.
Does ignica.com show known scam, phishing, or malware signals?
At assessment time, CyStack did not find ignica.com or related infrastructure on any scam, phishing, or malware warning list after checking 5 online reputation sources. This result reflects external observations; it does not guarantee absolute safety or verify the organization’s legal status or reputation.
Potentially exposed domain email addressesChecks infostealer data only for email addresses whose domain exactly matches this target. A record is not counted merely because someone visited or signed in to this website.0 matching email exposure records
0Matching email exposure records
0Related infected devices (estimated)
No exposure record was found for an email address whose domain exactly matches this target. This does not guarantee that an exposure has never occurred.
Data provided by
Frequently asked questions
What affects the security of ignica.com?
A valid SSL certificate still does not prove that ignica.com is safe, legitimate, or free of scam signals. For a more complete assessment, this report also checks phishing and malware, exposed email records, IPs and open ports, subdomains, technologies, and CVEs that may apply to observed versions.
Does ignica.com use HTTPS, and is its SSL certificate valid?
ignica.com used a valid SSL certificate at assessment time, valid until December 21, 2026. This status may change when the certificate expires or the server configuration changes.
Data compiled from CyStack cybersecurity monitoring systems
CyStack compiles scan results from its internal cybersecurity monitoring systems, including CyStack VulnScan and CyStack Threat Intelligence, together with publicly available Internet data. The assessment only observes and analyzes information already available; it does not attempt unauthorized access, test passwords, send exploit code, or change or disrupt the assessed system.
These 3 failed checks or warnings have the greatest impact on the result for ignica.com.
Known-exploited CVE candidatesFound 1 known-exploited candidate(s), but the external product fingerprint requires verification.Critical
Why it matters
This check asks whether an applicable CVE candidate also appears in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. A positive match means attackers have used that vulnerability in real incidents and warrants urgent investigation, but the installed software still needs to be confirmed as affected.
What to do
Verify the installed product immediately and follow the CISA and vendor instructions for mitigation, patching, or upgrading if it is affected.
Allowed browser content (CSP)The inspected root HTML response does not include a Content-Security-Policy header.High
Why it matters
Content Security Policy (CSP) limits where scripts, styles, frames, and other browser content may come from. A strong policy reduces the impact if an attacker manages to inject content into a page.
What to do
Define only the sources the application needs, test the policy before activating it, and avoid broad wildcard (*) rules, unsafe-inline, and unsafe-eval where possible.
Potential CVEs for observed versionsFound 7 potentially applicable CVE candidate(s), including 4 high or critical candidate(s).High
Why it matters
This check compares an observed product only when a reliable version and exact CPE identity are available, using applicability records from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Any returned match is a lead, not confirmation: the installed software may include vendor fixes or differ from the version visible on the Internet.
What to do
Discovered subdomains (67)Subdomains discovered by CyStack, with sensitive-looking names shown first. Availability is verified during this assessment; individual subdomains have not been separately security-tested.Complete
This is a quick, point-in-time check from outside the organization. It can surface visible risks, but it does not replace penetration testing or an authenticated assessment.
Have @ignica.com email addresses appeared in exposed data or information-stealer (infostealer) logs?
No record associated with an @ignica.com email address was found in the currently available data. This does not rule out incidents that have not been observed.
Which public IPs, services, and ports does ignica.com expose?
The assessment observed 1 public IPs and 2 open ports for ignica.com. An open port is not the same as a vulnerability, but the website owner should keep every public service updated and appropriately restrict access.
How many subdomains of ignica.com have been discovered?
The assessment observed 67 public subdomains of ignica.com. This list can reveal additional entry points such as APIs, administration systems, or test environments, but it does not mean that every subdomain is risky.
Confirm the exact installed package and read the vendor advisory. If that installation is affected, apply the vendor patch or upgrade to a fixed version.
Industry
Updated at 
Japan
