Opening the security report for code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
Loading the security report for code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
Is code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering Safe? Security Assessment | CyStack
code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
figma.engineering
Industry
–
Origin
–
Global rank
–
Rank in
–
Updated at
A93.2/100
Security level
Excellent
Data confidence
High
Scope checked
90%
The score and grade reflect the result recorded at scan time. Review each check and its evidence for the full context.
Is the website “code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering” safe?
This report summarizes the security observations recorded for code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering at scan time. Review each check and its evidence for the full context.
Does code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering show known scam, phishing, or malware signals?
At assessment time, CyStack did not find code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering or related infrastructure on any scam, phishing, or malware warning list after checking 5 online reputation sources. This result reflects external observations; it does not guarantee absolute safety or verify the organization’s legal status or reputation.
Compare the security level of each assessed category at a glance.
Network attack surface95.5/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Web security100/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Data sources
Data compiled from CyStack cybersecurity monitoring systems
CyStack compiles scan results from its internal cybersecurity monitoring systems, including CyStack VulnScan and CyStack Threat Intelligence, together with publicly available Internet data. The assessment only observes and analyzes information already available; it does not attempt unauthorized access, test passwords, send exploit code, or change or disrupt the assessed system.
These 3 failed checks or warnings have the greatest impact on the result for code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering.
DMARC blocking policyThe effective DMARC policy is quarantine.High
Why it matters
A policy of quarantine or reject tells receiving services to move suspicious mail to spam or refuse it. A monitoring-only policy (p=none) records the problem but does not ask receivers to stop spoofed mail.
What to do
After every legitimate sender passes DMARC, move gradually to quarantine and then reject, covering 100% of messages.
HSTS availabilityThe HTTPS response does not contain an effective HSTS policy.Medium
Why it matters
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) tells a browser to use HTTPS automatically on future visits. This reduces the chance that a visitor is downgraded to an unencrypted connection.
What to do
After confirming that every required page works over HTTPS, send the Strict-Transport-Security header on all HTTPS responses.
Authorized email senders (SPF)No SPF record was found.Medium
Why it matters
Sender Policy Framework (SPF) lists the systems allowed to send email for the domain. Without it, receiving services have less evidence to distinguish legitimate mail from spoofed mail.
What to do
Publish one SPF TXT record that includes every legitimate email service and no unauthorized sender.
Transport encryption91.9/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Threat reputation100/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Vulnerability and technology risk0/100 · Not enough data0% of this category was checked
Email authentication61.9/100 · Review100% of this category was checked
Data exposure100/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Domain and DNS hygiene88.9/100 · Good100% of this category was checked
Items to fix or review
This list contains only failed checks and warnings. Checks without enough evidence are grouped separately below.
DMARC blocking policyEmail protectionNeeds review
Check result
The effective DMARC policy is quarantine.
Why it matters
A policy of quarantine or reject tells receiving services to move suspicious mail to spam or refuse it. A monitoring-only policy (p=none) records the problem but does not ask receivers to stop spoofed mail.
What to do
After every legitimate sender passes DMARC, move gradually to quarantine and then reject, covering 100% of messages.
The HTTPS response does not contain an effective HSTS policy.
Why it matters
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) tells a browser to use HTTPS automatically on future visits. This reduces the chance that a visitor is downgraded to an unencrypted connection.
Sender Policy Framework (SPF) lists the systems allowed to send email for the domain. Without it, receiving services have less evidence to distinguish legitimate mail from spoofed mail.
CyStack confirmed at least 141 active DNS subdomains of figma.engineering. 22 names may expose sensitive services; discovery was partial, so more may exist.
Why it matters
Names containing admin, development, staging, VPN, database, or monitoring terms may point attackers toward valuable systems. A name alone does not prove exposure, but it identifies a surface that should be reviewed.
Email routing records (MX)Domain and DNSNeeds review
Check result
No explicit MX or Null MX record was found.
Why it matters
MX records direct incoming email to the correct mail servers. Broken records can stop delivery, while a Null MX clearly tells senders that the domain does not receive email.
DMARC aggregate reports show which systems send email using the domain and which messages fail verification. They help find both impersonation attempts and legitimate services that need correction.
A domain should clearly state whether it receives email. Without valid MX records or a Null MX, senders may try an unintended server and delivery behavior becomes unpredictable.
Allowed certificate issuers (CAA)Domain and DNSNeeds review
Check result
Found 0 applicable CAA record(s).
Why it matters
Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records state which certificate providers may issue certificates for the domain. This reduces the chance of an unintended provider issuing one.
DNS response protection (DNSSEC)Domain and DNSNeeds review
Check result
No DNSSEC DS delegation was found.
Why it matters
DNSSEC adds digital signatures so resolvers can detect forged DNS answers. This quick check confirms the parent domain has a DS record, but it does not validate the complete signature chain.
Inconclusive checks (2)These checks lack reliable evidence. They are neither confirmed issues nor passed checks.
Known-exploited status is inconclusive because the reference data or CVE matching coverage was incomplete.
Why it matters
Comparing applicable CVEs with CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog distinguishes theoretical risk from vulnerabilities exploited in real attacks. The product, version, and relevant CVE must be identified correctly before reaching that conclusion.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Potential CVEs for observed versionsSoftware vulnerabilitiesUnknown
Check result
Observed 1 versioned product(s), but none had a safe exact CPE mapping.
Why it matters
The detected product and version were compared with vulnerability records from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). A match is a lead, not confirmation: the installed software may include vendor fixes or may differ from the version visible on the Internet.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Data source:
nvd
Source link:
https://nvd.nist.gov/
Informational checks (4)These neutral observations add context and are counted as neither passed checks nor confirmed issues.
Blacklist check coverageIP reputationInformation
Check result
5 providers were definitive and 1 were inconclusive.
Why it matters
This shows how many independent blacklist services returned a clear result. A service that was unavailable was not checked successfully and must not be treated as a clean result.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
IPv4 addresses checked:
3
Blocklists reporting an issue:
0
Blocklists with no match:
5
Blocklists unavailable:
1
Blocklists checked conclusively:
5
Confirmed blocklist matches:
No
Technologies visible from the InternetSoftware vulnerabilitiesInformation
Check result
Public signals from the website and its open services revealed 3 technology item(s).
Why it matters
Response headers, page content, and other public clues suggest which technologies the service uses. These observations help explain the attack surface, but they can be incomplete or mistaken and do not by themselves confirm a vulnerability.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Technologies found:
3
Detection method:
Website and exposed-service analysis
Observed WAF, CDN, or edge serviceSoftware vulnerabilitiesInformation
Check result
Passive response signals identified one or more WAF, CDN, or edge products; enforcement was not tested.
Why it matters
Public response details suggest that a Web Application Firewall (WAF), CDN, or other edge service is present. This quick scan identified the provider but did not test whether attack blocking is configured or working correctly.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Observed 1 versioned product(s); 0 had exact CPE mappings and 0 completed lookup(s).
Why it matters
This shows how many detected products had reliable version information and an exact CPE identity, allowing them to be checked against CVE applicability data. A product that could not be checked must not be treated as free of known vulnerabilities.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Software items found:
1
Passed or not applicable (37)
Certificate matches the websiteHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The certificate matches the requested target.
Why it matters
The certificate must list the exact hostname visitors requested in its Subject Alternative Names (SAN). A mismatch produces browser warnings because the certificate may belong to a different service.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Assessed domain:
code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
Certificate domain names:
code-eval-reports.devenv01.figma.engineering
Browser-trusted certificateHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The certificate chains to a trusted root.
Why it matters
Browsers trust a website only when its certificate can be traced to a recognized certificate provider. An untrusted certificate causes warnings and prevents visitors from reliably confirming the website's identity.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Certificate issuer:
CN=Amazon ECDSA 256 M04,O=Amazon,C=US
Secure website connection (HTTPS)HTTPS and encryption
Check result
A TLS handshake succeeded on port 443.
Why it matters
HTTPS encrypts data between visitors and the website and helps prove they reached the intended service. Without it, network observers may read or alter traffic and browsers may show a security warning.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
IP address:
16.144.166.189
Version:
TLS 1.3
Encryption suite:
TLS AES 128 GCM SHA256
Public DNS recordsDomain and DNS
Check result
The target resolved to 3 public IP address(es).
Why it matters
Public DNS connects the domain to its Internet addresses. Missing or incorrect records can make the service unreachable or send traffic to the wrong system.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
IP addresses:
16.144.166.189, 184.34.196.16, 44.239.204.169
Password form transport securityWebsite protectionNot applicable
Check result
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
If either a password page or the address receiving its form uses HTTP, someone observing the network may read or change the submitted password.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Scan boundary:
Redirected outside the assessed domain
Source response status:
302
Public management service exposurePublic infrastructure
Check result
No public management service was found on the scanned TCP port set.
Why it matters
Remote administration services such as RDP, VNC, Docker, Kubernetes, and management consoles are high-value targets. Public exposure allows anyone on the Internet to attempt passwords or exploit an unpatched service.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Ports checked:
21, 22, 23, 25, 53, 80, 110, 111, 139, 143… and 48 more
Services selected for identification:
6
Database or cache exposed to the InternetPublic infrastructure
Check result
No public datastore service was found on the scanned TCP port set.
Why it matters
Databases and caches often contain sensitive information and are normally used only by internal applications. Direct Internet access makes password attacks and configuration mistakes much more likely to become a data breach.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Ports checked:
21, 22, 23, 25, 53, 80, 110, 111, 139, 143… and 48 more
Services selected for identification:
6
File-sharing service exposed to the InternetPublic infrastructure
Check result
No public file-sharing service was found on the scanned TCP port set.
Why it matters
Services such as SMB, NFS, and rsync can reveal or modify shared files and have a history of serious vulnerabilities. They rarely need to accept connections directly from the public Internet.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Ports checked:
21, 22, 23, 25, 53, 80, 110, 111, 139, 143… and 48 more
Services selected for identification:
6
Unencrypted legacy servicePublic infrastructure
Check result
No public legacy cleartext service was found on the scanned TCP port set.
Why it matters
Older services such as Telnet, FTP, and unencrypted mail or directory protocols can send passwords and data in readable form. Anyone able to observe the network path may capture them.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Ports checked:
21, 22, 23, 25, 53, 80, 110, 111, 139, 143… and 48 more
Services selected for identification:
6
Session cookies protected from scripts (HttpOnly)Website protection
Check result
The result recorded “Session cookies protected from scripts (HttpOnly)” as passed at scan time.
Why it matters
HttpOnly prevents browser scripts from directly reading a cookie. It does not fix script injection, but it makes theft of session and authentication cookies more difficult.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Session-related cookies:
1
Session cookies using HttpOnly:
1
Cookies sent only over HTTPS (Secure)Website protection
Check result
The result recorded “Cookies sent only over HTTPS (Secure)” as passed at scan time.
Why it matters
The Secure attribute prevents a browser from sending a cookie over unencrypted HTTP. Without it, session or authentication data may be exposed to someone observing the network.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Total:
1
Cookies using Secure:
1
Cookies using HttpOnly:
1
Cookies missing SameSite:
0
Certificate expiry and validityHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The certificate is valid from 2026-05-02T00:00:00Z to 2026-11-15T23:59:59Z.
Why it matters
A certificate works only between its start and expiry dates. An expired, not-yet-valid, or soon-to-expire certificate can trigger browser warnings and interrupt access to the website or API.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Valid from:
Expires at:
Days remaining:
86
Certificate key and signature strengthHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The certificate uses ECDSA-SHA256 with a 256-bit public key.
Why it matters
The certificate's public key and signature algorithm protect it from forgery. Keys that are too short or signatures based on obsolete algorithms provide less protection against modern attacks.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Signature algorithm:
ECDSA-SHA256
Public-key algorithm:
ECDSA
Public-key size:
256
Supported TLS versionsHTTPS and encryption
Check result
Accepted versions: TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3.
Why it matters
TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 use outdated security designs and are no longer accepted by modern standards. Leaving them enabled allows older, weaker connection methods.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
No independent abuse-list consensus was found across 5 definitive providers.
Why it matters
Security and email providers maintain DNS-based blacklists of IP addresses associated with spam, malware, or compromised systems. Several current, independent listings are a strong reason to investigate, although a shared IP can sometimes affect unrelated customers.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
IPv4 addresses checked:
3
Blocklists reporting an issue:
0
Blocklists with no match:
5
Email spoofing protection (DMARC)Email protection
Check result
A DMARC policy was found.
Why it matters
DMARC lets the domain owner tell receiving services what to do when the visible From address is not verified by SPF or DKIM. Without DMARC, attackers have more opportunity to impersonate the domain in phishing email.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The core DMARC policy tags passed structural validation.
Why it matters
Receiving services may ignore a DMARC record that contains duplicate fields, invalid values, or is published at the wrong DNS name. An ignored record provides no reliable protection from domain impersonation.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
An expired domain stops directing users to the organization's services and may eventually become available to someone else. A domain close to expiry leaves little time to recover from payment or account problems.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Registration expires at:
Days remaining:
88
Domain registration statusDomain and DNS
Check result
RDAP returned 1 status value(s); 0 require attention.
Why it matters
Registrar or registry restrictions such as hold, redemption, or pending deletion can disable the domain. If they are not resolved, the organization may lose control of its website and email identity.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) decides which websites may read responses from this service in a visitor's browser. Rules that trust arbitrary origins, especially with login cookies, can expose private data to another website.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy (CSP) limits where scripts, styles, frames, and other browser content may come from. A strong policy reduces the impact if an attacker manages to inject content into a page.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The result recorded “Cross-site cookie protection (SameSite)” as passed at scan time.
Why it matters
SameSite limits when a browser includes cookies in requests started by another website. This helps prevent another site from silently making an authenticated request on a user's behalf.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Total:
1
Cookies missing SameSite:
0
SameSite=None cookies missing Secure:
0
Complete certificate chainHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The server presented 3 certificate(s).
Why it matters
The server must provide the intermediate certificates that connect its website certificate to a trusted provider. If any are missing, some browsers, mobile devices, or API clients may reject the connection.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Certificates in the chain:
3
Automatic redirect to HTTPSHTTPS and encryption
Check result
The HTTP root reaches HTTPS within the target domain before redirecting outside scan scope.
Why it matters
Visitors may enter an address beginning with HTTP or follow an old link. Redirecting them immediately to HTTPS prevents the rest of the visit from continuing over an unencrypted connection.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Website reachable:
Yes
Redirects followed:
2
Final connection:
https
Scan boundary:
Redirected outside the assessed domain
Infostealer credential exposureExposed data
Check result
No matching credential exposure records were found in the currently indexed intelligence data. This does not prove that no exposure exists.
Why it matters
Infostealer intelligence may contain credentials associated with the domain, but it does not prove that an account is current, valid, or still exposed.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
How exposed email records are matched:
Only email addresses whose domain exactly matches this website
Collection refresh status:
completed
Matching exposed email records:
0
Protection from deceptive framing (clickjacking)Website protectionNot applicable
Check result
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Another website can place this page inside a hidden or misleading frame and trick a user into clicking an unintended action. Frame restrictions tell browsers which sites, if any, may embed the page.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Scan boundary:
Redirected outside the assessed domain
Source response status:
302
Insecure content on an HTTPS pageWebsite protectionNot applicable
Check result
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
An HTTPS page can still load scripts, frames, styles, or forms over unencrypted HTTP. An attacker on the network may alter that content and compromise the otherwise secure page.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Without the nosniff setting, a browser may guess a file's type and treat harmless-looking content as executable code. This can turn an incorrect Content-Type into a security issue.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Header present:
No
Scan boundary:
Redirected outside the assessed domain
Public directory listingSoftware vulnerabilitiesNot applicable
Check result
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
When a web server automatically lists a directory, visitors may discover files that were never linked publicly, including backups, logs, or deployment artifacts.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The scan recorded “SPF protection level” as not applicable.
Why it matters
The final SPF rule tells receiving services how confidently they should reject unlisted senders. A permissive result allows more spoofed mail to appear legitimate than a hard fail (-all).
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The scan recorded “Valid SPF configuration” as not applicable.
Why it matters
More than one SPF record, invalid terms, or too many DNS lookups can make SPF return a permanent error. Receiving services may then be unable to verify authorized senders.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
No public unexpected service was found on the scanned TCP port set.
Why it matters
Every open service can be discovered and attacked and must be configured, monitored, and patched. Services without a clear public purpose add risk without providing business value.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Complete:
Yes
Ports checked:
21, 22, 23, 25, 53, 80, 110, 111, 139, 143… and 48 more
Services selected for identification:
6
DNS service redundancyDomain and DNS
Check result
Found 4 authoritative name server(s).
Why it matters
Authoritative name servers tell visitors where the domain is hosted. Depending on only one server creates a single point of failure for the website and email.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Permissions-Policy controls whether this page and embedded content may use features such as the camera, microphone, and location. Leaving unused features available creates unnecessary access paths.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
When a visitor follows a link, the browser may send the previous page's URL to the destination. Paths and query values in that URL can reveal sensitive context to another website.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Evidence and check scope
Scan boundary:
Redirected outside the assessed domain
Source response status:
302
References
HSTS protection periodHTTPS and encryptionNot applicable
Check result
The scan recorded “HSTS protection period” as not applicable.
Why it matters
The max-age value controls how long browsers remember to use HTTPS. A very short period provides limited protection, while includeSubDomains also covers every subdomain and can break one that does not support HTTPS.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
The destination is outside this scan's domain boundary, so this control was not assessed from the redirect response.
Why it matters
Exact web server or framework versions help attackers quickly look for known weaknesses that may apply. Hiding a version is not a substitute for patching, but unnecessary disclosure gives away useful targeting information.
What to do next
Review the recorded evidence with a security specialist before using this result for a current decision.
Matched records contain an email address whose domain exactly matches the assessed website's registrable domain. Credential records are intelligence observations, not proof that an account is still active. Estimated victim devices are infostealer infection devices associated with matched records; they are not evidence that those devices are owned or operated by the assessed organization.
Industry
Updated at 
