CWE-250 là gì?
Đang phân tích dữ liệu...
Đang phân tích dữ liệu...
| Tác động | Phạm vi | Diễn giải |
|---|---|---|
| Chiếm đặc quyền hoặc mạo danh, Thực thi mã hoặc lệnh trái phép, Đọc dữ liệu ứng dụng, Từ chối dịch vụ: sập, thoát hoặc khởi động lại | Tính bí mật, Tính toàn vẹn, Tính sẵn sàng, Kiểm soát truy cập | An attacker will be able to gain access to any resources that are allowed by the extra privileges. Common results include executing code, disabling services, and reading restricted data. New weaknesses can be exposed because running with extra privileges, such as root or Administrator, can disable the normal security checks being performed by the operating system or surrounding environment. Other pre-existing weaknesses can turn into security vulnerabilities if they occur while operating at raised privileges. |
| Phương pháp | Cách làm | Hiệu quả |
|---|---|---|
| Phân tích thủ công | This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. | — |
| Hộp đen | Use monitoring tools that examine the software's process as it interacts with the operating system and the network. This technique is useful in cases when source code is unavailable, if the software was not developed by you, or if you want to verify that the build phase did not introduce any new weaknesses. Examples include debuggers that directly attach to the running process; system-call tracing utilities such as truss (Solaris) and strace (Linux); system activity monitors such as FileMon, RegMon, Process Monitor, and other Sysinternals utilities (Windows); and sniffers and protocol analyzers that monitor network traffic. Attach the monitor to the process and perform a login. Look for library functions and system calls that indicate when privileges are being raised or dropped. Look for accesses of resources that are restricted to normal users.Note that this technique is only useful for privilege issues related to system resources. It is not likely to detect application-level business rules that are related to privileges, such as if a blog system allows a user to delete a blog entry without first checking that the user has administrator privileges. | — |
| Phân tích tĩnh tệp nhị phân hoặc bytecode tự động | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Compare binary / bytecode to application permission manifest ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis | Cao |
| Phân tích tĩnh tệp nhị phân hoặc bytecode thủ công | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies | SOAR một phần |
| Phân tích động với diễn giải kết quả tự động | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Host-based Vulnerability Scanners - Examine configuration for flaws, verifying that audit mechanisms work, ensure host configuration meets certain predefined criteria | SOAR một phần |
| Phân tích động với diễn giải kết quả thủ công | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Host Application Interface Scanner | SOAR một phần |
| Phân tích tĩnh mã nguồn thủ công | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Manual Source Code Review (not inspections) ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source | Cao |
| Phân tích tĩnh mã nguồn tự động | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Source code Weakness Analyzer Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer | SOAR một phần |
| Phân tích tĩnh tự động | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Configuration Checker Permission Manifest Analysis | SOAR một phần |
| Rà soát kiến trúc hoặc thiết kế | According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.) Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Attack Modeling | Cao |
Dưới đây là các lỗ hổng tiêu biểu liên quan đến CWE-250, dựa theo mức độ ưu tiên
CWE™ Program, operated by The MITRE Corporation. Copyright © 2006–2026, The MITRE Corporation. The MITRE Corporation hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use CWE for research, development, and commercial purposes. CWE Terms of Use.
Giải pháp CyStack VulnScan liên tục phát hiện tài sản, xác minh lỗ hổng và giúp đội ngũ bảo mật ưu tiên khắc phục cho toàn bộ doanh nghiệp.
Khám phá CyStack VulnScanvi